icon caret-left icon caret-right instagram pinterest linkedin facebook twitter goodreads question-circle facebook circle twitter circle linkedin circle instagram circle goodreads circle pinterest circle

Blog

Wrestling the Information into Order

My Genealogical Process - Wrestling the Information into Order

 

When people find out that I wrote a 300-page book based on my discoveries of over 800 ancestors who immigrated to the U.S., they often ask how I found them all.  I suspect people are really asking two questions.  First, how did I go about tracing the family lines that resulted in this astonishing number of found ancestors, and second, how did I test the veracity of these connections?  The answer to the first question is tenacity, blind luck, and a latent sense of feminism.  The answer to the second is that I used to be a practicing lawyer, and more to the point, a law student.  Law students learn to research, to leave no stone unturned in their search for legal precedent that will support their client's case.  Accuracy and documentary proof are essential ingredients to this process, and they form the background of genealogical research as well.

 

Tracing the Family Lines - Fits and Starts: 

 

As I mentioned in the previous post, I think it is profoundly unfair that genealogists and historians often focus on the family surname, which limits ancestral information to the male line.  Little did I know that tracing the lineage of both female and male ancestors to their arrival in North America would result in an explosion of information.  My first attempt, a page on the Dwights, looked like this:

 

IMG-2810.jpeg

 

Hmmm, that didn't work very well.  I didn't have enough room to add much detail or follow any female lines.  How about turning it horizontally?

 

IMG-2811.jpeg

 

 

This produced a more satisfactory result.  Starting with a horizontally aligned, linen-colored piece of paper (to distinguish it from the many other papers I usually have lying around), I drew a horizontal line near the bottom and wrote: David W. Richardson m. Letitia A. DeVillar.  Under the line, I added our birthdates and our marriage date.  I was on a roll!  Above both our names I drew two lines in a V shape and at the top of each V I drew another line and wrote William H. Richardson m. Elizabeth K. Dwight above my husband's name and Alfonso M. DeVillar m. Nina C. Samudio above mine.  Then I added the relevant marriage and birth dates.  I continued this process up the page for another couple of generations and soon ran out of space.  No problem, I started another page. 

 

As the ancestor tree grew and grew, I needed new pages.  By about the 20th page, I realized I had to develop a more sophisticated organizational system.  At this point I started to add each couple's generation so starting with David, I noted his parents, grandparents, great-grandparents, 2nd great-grandparents, 3rd great-grandparents, etc.  This was getting even more complicated, especially when I realized I would be going back to 11th great-grandparents in some cases.  I started to label the pages for easier cross-reference and as they piled up, I indicated which page to consult next whenever I ran out of room on a particular family. 

 

At this point, there was no way I could mentally keep track of all the ancestors, so I created a master sheet of all the surnames and where they were located.  While I should have made a nice, neat spreadsheet, frankly, it was faster to hand write the information.  Whatever works, right?

 

When I finally got to the top of the tree, lo and behold, there was a Mayflower ancestor.  In fact, eight of David's direct ancestors were on the ship of 1620.  People often express surprise at this, but I understand it is common to have multiple Mayflower ancestors.  Only 102 passengers sailed on her, and many died during their first winter in New England.  The entire Pilgrim population never grew past 300-400 people, and so there was a lot of intermarriage.  If you come across one Mayflower ancestor it is likely you have another.

 

Too Many Sheets of Paper and No Easy Way to Access Information Quickly:

 

Soon I ran into the limitations of using 8x10 paper and adding lots of facts and anecdotes in the margins – they just didn't fit.  At this point, I went out and bought hundreds of 5x8 index cards in several colors.  Using one color for each generation, I had plenty of space to take notes, record the names of the couple's children, the year of immigration, the ship(s) they arrived on, their recorded activities, family anecdotes, etc.  The list of children became important when it turned out that more than one of the children were direct ancestors.  These cards also came in very handy when I went back in the second stage of my research and began fact-checking.  With the index cards, I had room to write down the sources I was using for my research.  They looked like this:

 

IMG-2828.jpeg

 

Not the Typical Genealogy Research Log:

 

I should add that these hand-written cards are very different in appearance from what a genealogist would use while conducting research for a paying client.  Normally, a genealogist would use a Word or Excel research template, or the newer platform-based logs that are currently being introduced.  Since my use case was different, I needed a different sort of record - one that could be easily sorted according to how I wanted to use it. 

 

For example, I'm currently writing an article about Grissell (Fletcher) [Jewell] [Griggs] [Kibby] [Gurney] Burge, the most married woman in colonial New England.  With the card system, I can easily pull the cards for her parents, her and her husband(s), and her children.  The different colored cards help me keep the facts straight from a generational perspective, and they are easily separated from additional notes I take on the towns they lived in, the families of the non-ancestor husbands, etc. 

 

Likewise, when I write a chapter about a war, such as King Philip's War (1675-1676), I can pull all the cards for men who fought and families who were adversely affected, enabling me to write a richer and broader narrative about the war and our ancestors' role in it.  When I finish the article or chapter, the cards will go back into their proper generational order in my research box.

 

IMG-2856.jpeg

 

 

More About the Research:

 

As I mentioned above, research training, tenacity and blind luck are important in conducting genealogical research.  In my research, I relied as much as possible on verifiable primary sources and reputable secondary sources rather than on other sources.  While family lore and anecdotes are fun, as I wanted to uncover the "true" family history. 

 

Tenacity is important because sometimes you run into what genealogists call a "brick wall."  This is a point at which the verifiable record dies out, and you cannot find the information that makes the family connection.  This is what happened with David's ancestor, Grace (Fairbanks) Bullen.  For centuries her maiden name was unknown, and no one knew she was connected to the Fairbanks family of Dedham, MA.  I conducted a long, frustrating search but after several weeks all I had to go on was an unverified claim in a self-published book.  I called the town historian in Dedham trying to turn up a record or perhaps establish the site of her burial, and while we didn't come up with anything usable, she has been a great help in transcribing ancient hand-written records as in the document I describe below. 

 

One day I found an Accounting of Expenditures Grace's mother, Lydia (Prescott) [Fairbanks] Barron, had submitted to the Court as part of the settlement of her first husband's estate.  By this time, Lydia had moved to Boston, remarried, and was using her new husband's name.  This was why my search, focused on the Fairbanks name and their towns of residency, had not led me to the document sooner.  Listing payments for wedding clothes, a cradle, and doctor's fees, the Accounting established that Lydia had a daughter that lived to marriageable age, married, gave birth, and died.  While the daughter was not named, the Accounting also established that Jonas Fairbanks, Lydia's first husband, was this daughter's father.  Lydia and Jonas only had two daughters, and only Grace was unaccounted for.  Using this document to support circumstantial evidence that the daughter was Grace (Fairbanks) who married Ephraim Bullen, I submitted an article with these "proofs" to the New England Historical and Genealogical Register.  The Register's genealogists fact-checked my research and agreed that Grace Bullen was one and the same as Grace Fairbanks, and they published my article.  (An earlier version of the article is included in the Works section of this website.)  In this case, my research tenacity paid off.

 

Blind luck also comes into play at times.  This occurred when David's great, great-grandfather, Marshall Carpenter, a Brookfield, Vermont resident, died in Ohio while visiting his daughter.  The Ohio records had been lost to fire, and his death was not recorded in Vermont.  I really needed to establish that the Marshall Carpenter who died in Ohio was the same man as the Vermont Marshall Carpenter because this link was critical to proving one of David's Mayflower lines.  The Mayflower Society, a stickler for unshakable evidence, wanted a Death Certificate signed by the attending physician.  Again, I pursued several leads, all of which proved fruitless.  One day, in desperation, I called and left a message with the Brookfield Town Clerk, hoping that she could find some piece of evidence that had escaped the online databases. 

 

The Town Clerk only worked on Tuesdays and Thursdays from 10am – 3pm, but she followed up with me the next time she was in the office.  When I told her that I was trying to find some record of Marshall's death, she dove into the search with determination.  Some days later she dejectedly informed me that all she could find was a document called a "Transportation of Corpse" from when Marshall's body was returned to Vermont for burial.  She sent me a copy of the document just in case it might be helpful, and it turned out to have exactly what I needed.  At the bottom of the Transportation of Corpse certificate was a standard Death Certificate, including a cause of death and the attending physician's signature, which ultimately satisfied the Mayflower Society and enabled me to establish David's Mayflower line.  I chalk this one up to blind luck, although tenacity may have played a part as well!

 

A Final Piece of Advice:

 

If you want to start a genealogical research project and don't want to hire a professional genealogist, for goodness sake take a course on the topic.  Don't put yourself through the fits and starts that I went through.  This post is meant more as a cautionary tale than as a blueprint on how to properly organize research.   

Be the first to comment

Choosing Which Ancestors to Research

Starting with Dave's parents: the Dwights and the Richardsons.

 

Researching the Dwight family:

 

I decided to start my research with my mother-in-law's family because we knew they arrived in North America quite early.  Tracing the Dwight family turned out to be deceptively easy.  The first immigrant, John Dwight, arrived in North America in 1635, and the family didn't leave New England for a couple hundred years.  Many Dwights attained notoriety in one way or another, and the family had a reputation for being God-fearing, hard-working New Englanders of the most steadfast kind. 

 

Further assistance came from a 3-volume family genealogy published in 1874.  Apparently, genealogy was quite popular in the late 1800's and lots of genealogical tomes were written, some for wealthy Americans who longed to find royal or otherwise famous ancestry and whose desire for such inevitably captured the attention of charlatans only too willing to pose as legitimate genealogists and create royal ancestry out of nothing.  This was not the case with the Dwights.  The gentleman who penned the book, Benjamin Woodbridge Dwight, was a noted theologian and scholar before turning his attention to the family genealogy.  No scandals or royal ancestors turned up in the book; in fact, the family came across as rather ordinary.  This, however, may have been partly due to the book's format, a rather tedious list of so-and-so married so-and-so followed by a list of all their children, and all the children's marriages, and then then a list of all the grandchildren and their marriages and children, and so on.  This format is typical of family genealogies that begin with one ancestor and trace all his descendants through time.  Note the word "his".  The typical format ignores the history of the female line.  For a woman that means our mothers and fathers, their parents, grandparents, great-grandparents etc. aren't accounted for.  We are effectively erased from the ancestral story.  (See my article on the law of Coverture under the Works tab for more on this topic.)

 

Honoring the Women:

 

Personally, I have always found it irksome that genealogists emphasize the man and the surname and rarely focus on the woman (with some exceptions of course).  This infuriates me since children are equally the product of their father AND their mother.  I was determined to not ignore the women in the family history, so I traced their ancestry as well.  This meant going backward in time and tracing every person in the family tree.

 

Fortunately, modern databases make it easier to do this, but it adds a lot of information to the mix.  (More on handling that in a different post.)  Anyway, I felt like I was uncovering a much more full and engaging history that honored all ancestors, both male and female.  The bad news was that I was already a year into the research, and I hadn't even started on the Richardsons.  Doing that opened a whole new can of worms.

 

Researching the Richardsons:

 

The Richardsons were English Quakers who had emigrated first to Spanish Town, Jamaica, and then to Pennsylvania.   Samuel Richardson made a big splash in Philadelphia when, soon after landing and calling himself a "bricklayer" in legal documents, he proceeded to buy huge swaths of land, establish several successful businesses, and begin a 20-some-odd year political career, all activities well beyond the reach of your common bricklayer. 

 

This seemed promising, but soon a new glitch appeared.  Pennsylvania was one of mid-Atlantic colonies which also include New York, New Jersey, Delaware, Maryland, and Virginia.  New York and New Jersey were settled predominantly by colonists from the New England colonies who brought a New England sensibility to record-keeping, so their records are pretty robust.  The more southern mid-Atlantic colonies were not settled by detail-oriented Puritans but rather by a mix of people from different countries, different religions, and different cultures.  This seems to have led to a less rigorous approach to record-keeping.  Consequently, the records from this region are sparse compared to New England, New York, and New Jersey records.  This posed several problems. 

 

First, to augment the details of a person's life, I had to investigate more obscure resources.  For the Richardsons I researched Quaker meeting house records.  To find out more about the Herrs, who married into the Richardson family, I joined the Lancaster Mennonite Society to gain access to its wonderful records.  At one point I even considered establishing Virginia residency to gain access to its restricted records!  Fortunately, we only have a couple of ancestors there so for the moment I don't need to take drastic action. 

 

A second problem was that having fewer verified records meant that the crowd-sourced ancestry sites had an even greater quantity of bad information as amateur genealogists grabbed any data they could get, verified or not. 

 

A third problem was that it was much harder to figure out what these people were doing, why they were doing it, and with whom they were doing it.  I was still able to conduct the research but there were a lot more frustrating moments and "brick walls" (a dead-end that despite months or even years of research provides no definitive answer). 

 

I 'm still researching several of these particular ancestors and desperately trying to break through the brick walls created by the lack of a female ancestor's parentage.

 

 

2 Comments
Post a comment

A Note on Dates and Abbreviations

A Note on Dates and Abbreviations

 

Dates

Genealogical dates can be confusing!

 

The Julian Calendar: Early colonists used the Julian calendar, which was introduced by Julius Caesar in 46 BC.  The Julian calendar had a slight problem, which was that a small inaccuracy in it caused the calendar to "drift" over centuries and literally lose days.  By 1582 CE, the Julian calendar had drifted 10 days relative to the seasons, which was shifting Easter off its "seasonally appropriate" date.  The Catholic Church became concerned and decided to fix the calendar.

 

The Gregorian Calendar: Pope Gregorius XIII introduced a calendar reform in 1582 CE and so the new calendar is named after him.  To correct for the lost 10 days, the Church declared that Thursday, October 4, 1582 would be followed by Friday, October 15, 1582.  Voila, fixed!  This is the Gregorian calendar that we use today.

 

So why were New England colonists still using the Julian calendar?

Because England was a Protestant country and had no interest in adopting a Catholic calendar improvement.  Great Britain and her colonies used the Julian calendar until 1751.  Talk about stubborn…

 

Why does this matter?

It matters because historical and genealogical accuracy is important.  BUT there is a glitch.  Over time, historians, genealogists, and writers, even though striving for accuracy misread, misunderstood, and/or misstated dates.  People also mixed and matched the calendars, improperly using say, April 1, 1620 (Julian) interchangeably with April 1, 1620 (Gregorian) when they should be ten days off.  That makes striving for accuracy today even more difficult.

 

What's the solution for a genealogist?

Striving for accuracy is important.  That said, and with apologies to historians everywhere, my writing likely has dating mistakes.  Whenever possible, I try to recognize that the source of my information may have been using a different calendar, and I try to correct for that.  I also want to engage my readers and having a lot of date technicality seems like a sure turn-off if I'm not writing for academics.  So, I try to balance accuracy with accessibility.

 

More Info: 

If you'd like more information on the topic, check out this blog post by Tamura Jones: https://vitabrevis.americanancestors.org/2020/07/mayflower-myths-2020/

 

Glitch Number Two:

As if fixing drift weren't enough of a headache, the Gregorian calendar also started on January 1st.  Yet again, England figured that if the Catholic Church was for it, England would stand firm against it.  The English continued to use March 25th as the first day of the new year.  March was called the first month.  In dating events, anything occurring before March 25th had a double year.  So, any date between January 1st and March 25th would say, for example, 1 January 1647/8 and 24 March 1647/48.  Only on March 25th would you write 25 March 1648. 

 

But it gets worse!  Sometimes people would date something as "the 5th day of the 11th month".  This meant February 5, 1647.

 

Our historical records are filled with wonky dates such as these.

 

How does this affect our family history?

A perfect example concerns the death dates of John Dwight and his second wife, Elizabeth.  Elizabeth threw herself down a well, committing the unforgiveable sin of suicide.  This had contemporary New England in a tizzy, and it presents a peculiar conundrum for us because it's hard to tell if she did this before or after John died.  The difference is stark.  If she did it after he died, well, we can imagine she was a distraught widow and feel sympathy toward her.  If she did it before, we're left with the question of "why" to which there are no easy answers.  Complicating things, John's will treated her a wee bit harshly.  Hmmm, happy marriage?  Methinks not!

 

Abbreviations

Commonly used genealogical abbreviations:

~          about

b.         born

bp.       baptized

bro.      brother

bur.      buried

c.         circa

d.         died

dau.     daughter

fa.        father

m.        married

mo.      Mother

NFR    no further record

rem.     removed (moved to)

sis.       Sister

unk.     unknown

unm.    Unmarried

 

Colony abbreviations:

CC                  Connecticut Colony

MD                 Maryland Colony

L.I.                 Long Island (disputed between the Dutch and the English colonies)

MBC               Massachusetts Bay Colony

NHC               New Haven Colony

NJC                New Jersey Colony

NY                 New York Colony

Penn. Col.       Pennsylvania Colony

PC                  Plymouth Colony

RI                  Colony of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations

VC                 Virginia Colony

WC                Wessagusett Colony

1 Comments
Post a comment

From Inspiration to Action

From Inspiration to Action

February 10, 2023

 

In 2013, inspired by rumors that my husband's family had some really fascinating American ancestry and further motivated by a nagging sense that family history, once lost, cannot be recovered, I decided to research the family genealogy. 

My interest in the topic dates to 1987 when we moved to New England.  As transplanted Californians, my husband and I were often surprised when New Englanders, asked about our ancestry.  In California, the land of new and shiny, that topic never arose.  We were even more surprised when people, hearing that my husband's mother was a Dwight, nodded with interest and said that they might have Dwight ancestry as well.  It didn't hurt that Dave's uncle, John Dwight, was a larger-than-life character in Vermont's Champlain Valley, where we lived.  Nonetheless, it seemed like there was something else going on.  Twenty-five years later, I finally had the time to investigate.

Like most people, when I started my research, I signed up for ancestry.com and enthusiastically began studying the resources there and creating a family tree.  I should mention that there are several other sites like ancestry.com that offer similar services.  I use ancestry.com here as a stand-in for all of them.  These sites are wonderful ways to get started, but there is one big caveat. 

A Note on Crowd-sourced Research Sites

Sites such as ancestry.com offer a lot of valuable sources of information.  Unfortunately, my experience is that most people use the least reliable of their offerings.  These are the family trees that other people have published on the site and make available to users.  This is obviously a generous thing to do so I feel a bit guilty about what I'm about to write, but here goes.  The problem with using other people's research is that you are trusting that they are good researchers and thoughtful about what they publish.  Sometimes, however, people are sloppy researchers and don't verify the information they include in their own trees.  I learned this the hard way when I researched generations of one woman's history only to finally realize that she was a second wife and would have been about 5 years old when our ancestor was born!  Our ancestor was therefore a child of the first wife, and I had to throw all of the research on the second wife's ancestors away.  The person who included the second wife as the mother of our shared ancestor was a sloppy researcher and had not noticed or questioned the rather jarring age discrepancy.  This was a frustrating experience for me because I really wanted to uncover an accurate historical record of the family.  Luckily, it happened early on in my research, and it effectively scared me into seeking out better vetted resources.   

Ok, I'm a Research Nerd

Thankfully, such resources abound and include the New England Genealogical and Historical Society, The New York Genealogical and Biographical Record, the General Society of Mayflower Descendants, The American Genealogist, and various other scholarly journals and periodicals, history books, as well as church and society records.   Colony and town records also help and can be found among the larger databases listed at the beginning of this paragraph.  Local libraries and State databases are also quite helpful.  Many of these organizations require a nominal annual membership fee, but the access to verified data and extensive resources is well worth the price.  This kind of research is more time-consuming than clicking away on ancestry.com but again, if you want unimpeachable sources, this is the way to go. 

But Back to Ancestry.com

Ancestry.com and similar sites can still be useful to anyone who wants to research their genealogy.  You just have to be careful.  If you want to learn about your ancestors and don't feel like going the academic route, you can safely use these sites by verifying the sources that people use to substantiate their claims.  Always click on the icon for "sources" when you're looking at information in someone else's family tree.  If there are no sources or if the sources seem sketchy (the source for a Massachusetts-born ancestor's birth record is a link to a site in Ohio, for example) then keep looking until you find a more reliable tree.  Don't let one person's lazy "research" mess up your own.  Happy hunting!

 

The more I got into it, the more I wanted to ensure that my findings were accurate, so I sought and received verification of my findings from established organizations such as the Mayflower Society and the New England Historical Society.  As I gained proficiency in my new role, my earliest notes, scribbled on scraps of paper, were replaced by hand-written ancestor charts.  As the information ballooned, threatening to overwhelm my attempts at organizing it, I began using colored index cards for each married couple in the ancestral tree, where I could add details and cite sources.  Eventually, my research turned up 800+ ancestors and took over five years to complete.  To be honest, I'm still tying up loose ends even now!  Read my next post to see how it all started.

Be the first to comment